Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duncan Barkes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nomination has been withdrawn (speedy keep reason 1). (non-admin closure) MrClog (talk) 20:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan Barkes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP lacking independent references. Rathfelder (talk) 07:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article now contains several independent references. Rillington (talk) 13:40, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to withdraw my nomination. Rathfelder (talk) 07:38, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No reason why this article can't remain. There seems to be a number of reliable sources. I think it passes WP:GNG. - Funky Snack (Talk) 11:19, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.